Difference between revisions of "User:Johnnybravo/HistoricalElo"
Johnnybravo (talk | contribs) (Created page with "An effort to track the relative strength of each 4cc team throughout cup history. == Methodology == Elo ratings are calculated using the USCF rating system with the [http://w...") |
Johnnybravo (talk | contribs) (winter 2012) |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
== Methodology == | == Methodology == | ||
Elo ratings are calculated using the USCF rating system with the [http://www.chess.com/download/view/elo-rater-20 Elo Rating 2.0 software]. Teams are given an initial rating of 1300 for their first official match. Official cup matches are the only matches used; despite friendlies counting toward the rankings at the time I will not be using those games. Any matches stricken from the official record books, such as those affected by [[Dragongate]], are not accounted for. Penalty shootouts are counted as draws in the system. | Elo ratings are calculated using the USCF rating system with the [http://www.chess.com/download/view/elo-rater-20 Elo Rating 2.0 software]. Teams are given an initial rating of 1300 for their first official match. Official cup matches are the only matches used; despite friendlies counting toward the rankings at the time I will not be using those games. Any matches stricken from the official record books, such as those affected by [[Dragongate]], are not accounted for. Penalty shootouts are counted as draws in the system. | ||
When new teams are added to the cup, they are entered at the lowest ranking currently available in the table. For example, when /o/, /jp/, /tg/, and /co/ joined the cup in Winter 2012, they begin as tied at #17 in the rankings, and the change from that number is what is reflected in the table. Therefore, it is possible for a team to drop places in its' first-ever cup. | |||
All matches are rated equally - the Elo system is designed so that teams are rewarded by playing higher-ranked opponents as opposed to volume of matches. While this may lead to discrepancy when the Babby Cup is first introduced, I am currently of the opinion that the rankings will stabilize appropriately. | All matches are rated equally - the Elo system is designed so that teams are rewarded by playing higher-ranked opponents as opposed to volume of matches. While this may lead to discrepancy when the Babby Cup is first introduced, I am currently of the opinion that the rankings will stabilize appropriately. | ||
Line 42: | Line 44: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| align="center" | 13 || {{team away|soc}} || 900|| align="center" | [[File:Steady.png]] | | align="center" | 13 || {{team away|soc}} || 900|| align="center" | [[File:Steady.png]] | ||
|} | |||
==[[2012_4chan_Winter_Cup | 2012 Winter Cup]]== | |||
{| class="wikitable" | |||
|- | |||
! Ranking !! Team !! Elo !! Change | |||
|- | |||
| align="center" | 1 || {{team away|sp}} || 1740 || align="center" | [[File:Steady.png]] | |||
|- | |||
| align="center" | 2 || {{team away|ck}} || 1664|| align="center" | [[File:Increase.png]] 1 | |||
|- | |||
| align="center" | 3 ||{{team away|fit}} || 1565|| align="center" | [[File:Increase.png]] 2 | |||
|- | |||
| align="center" | 4 || {{team away|a}} || 1561|| align="center" | [[File:Decrease2.png]] 2 | |||
|- | |||
| align="center" | 5 || {{team away|k}} || 1555|| align="center" | [[File:Increase.png]] 8 | |||
|- | |||
| align="center" | 6 || {{team away|mu}} || 1529|| align="center" | [[File:Decrease2.png]] 2 | |||
|- | |||
| align="center" | 7 || {{team away|tg}} || 1525|| align="center" | [[File:Increase.png]] 10 | |||
|- | |||
| align="center" | 8 || {{team away|co}} || 1449|| align="center" | [[File:Increase.png]] 9 | |||
|- | |||
| align="center" | 9 || {{team away|v}} || 1347|| align="center" | [[File:Decrease2.png]] 4 | |||
|- | |||
| align="center" | 10 || {{team away|adv}} || 1333|| align="center" | [[File:Decrease2.png]] 3 | |||
|- | |||
| align="center" | 11 || {{team away|g}} || 1322|| align="center" | [[File:Decrease2.png]] 3 | |||
|- | |||
| align="center" | 12 || {{team away|jp}} || 1291|| align="center" | [[File:Increase.png]] 5 | |||
|- | |||
| align="center" | 13 || {{team away|x}} || 1281|| align="center" | [[File:Decrease2.png]] 4 | |||
|- | |||
| align="center" | 14 || {{team away|int}} || 1166|| align="center" | [[File:Decrease2.png]] 5 | |||
|- | |||
| align="center" | 15 || {{team away|b}} || 1147|| align="center" | [[File:Decrease2.png]] 1 | |||
|- | |||
| align="center" | 16 || {{team away|fa}} || 1090|| align="center" | [[File:Decrease2.png]] 7 | |||
|- | |||
| align="center" | 17 || {{team away|tv}} || 1065|| align="center" | [[File:Decrease2.png]] 8 | |||
|- | |||
| align="center" | 18 || {{team away|o}} || 903|| align="center" | [[File:Decrease2.png]] 1 | |||
|- | |||
| align="center" | 19 || {{team away|s}} || 900|| align="center" | [[File:Decrease2.png]] 6 | |||
|- | |||
| align="center" | 19 || {{team away|soc}} || 900|| align="center" | [[File:Decrease2.png]] 6 | |||
|} | |} |
Revision as of 00:19, 24 December 2015
An effort to track the relative strength of each 4cc team throughout cup history.
Methodology
Elo ratings are calculated using the USCF rating system with the Elo Rating 2.0 software. Teams are given an initial rating of 1300 for their first official match. Official cup matches are the only matches used; despite friendlies counting toward the rankings at the time I will not be using those games. Any matches stricken from the official record books, such as those affected by Dragongate, are not accounted for. Penalty shootouts are counted as draws in the system.
When new teams are added to the cup, they are entered at the lowest ranking currently available in the table. For example, when /o/, /jp/, /tg/, and /co/ joined the cup in Winter 2012, they begin as tied at #17 in the rankings, and the change from that number is what is reflected in the table. Therefore, it is possible for a team to drop places in its' first-ever cup.
All matches are rated equally - the Elo system is designed so that teams are rewarded by playing higher-ranked opponents as opposed to volume of matches. While this may lead to discrepancy when the Babby Cup is first introduced, I am currently of the opinion that the rankings will stabilize appropriately.
2011 Summer Cup
Ranking | Team | Elo | Change |
---|---|---|---|
1 | /sp/ | 1790 | |
2 | /a/ | 1722 | |
3 | /ck/ | 1716 | |
4 | /mu/ | 1619 | |
5 | /fit/ | 1457 | |
5 | /v/ | 1457 | |
7 | /adv/ | 1333 | |
7 | /g/ | 1333 | |
9 | /fa/ | 1166 | |
9 | /int/ | 1166 | |
9 | /tv/ | 1166 | |
9 | /x/ | 1166 | |
13 | /b/ | 900 | |
13 | /k/ | 900 | |
13 | /s/ | 900 | |
13 | /soc/ | 900 |
2012 Winter Cup
Ranking | Team | Elo | Change |
---|---|---|---|
1 | /sp/ | 1740 | |
2 | /ck/ | 1664 | 1 |
3 | /fit/ | 1565 | 2 |
4 | /a/ | 1561 | 2 |
5 | /k/ | 1555 | 8 |
6 | /mu/ | 1529 | 2 |
7 | /tg/ | 1525 | 10 |
8 | /co/ | 1449 | 9 |
9 | /v/ | 1347 | 4 |
10 | /adv/ | 1333 | 3 |
11 | /g/ | 1322 | 3 |
12 | /jp/ | 1291 | 5 |
13 | /x/ | 1281 | 4 |
14 | /int/ | 1166 | 5 |
15 | /b/ | 1147 | 1 |
16 | /fa/ | 1090 | 7 |
17 | /tv/ | 1065 | 8 |
18 | /o/ | 903 | 1 |
19 | /s/ | 900 | 6 |
19 | /soc/ | 900 | 6 |