Feedback

This page is out of date!
The passage of time has rendered information on this page obsolete. No information on the page should be considered referential until further notice. Please help us out by updating the information so that the article can become referential again.
Reason: Outdated and no longer maintained. Refer to Getting Involved or Contact instead. (Added on 2015-04-3)

This is an official 'open' page for feedback to the 4CCC and tottori !!sRN5AxsnGLL. Want to express what you think would be good for the cup? Please make a heading and do so here.

Please only speak for yourself on this page.

Topics:

Any opinion on changing efficiency from [wins/games] to the NFL system of [(wins + ½draws)/games]? --MauledByTheTigers (talk) 20:00, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

It's a simple enough change (if you can deal with whatever wiki code does the math). If somebody wants to make this change and not fuck up all the team boxes in the process, go for it. --Tottori (talk) 00:08, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

Will managers be able to veto/disregard a result in a team poll if we see it necessary? It shouldn't be fair if something from Monster High/Littlest Pet Shop general gets to be on the team and replace someone worthy when the majority of /co/ does not like or talk about such things. -- Mantis (talk) 22:19, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

My experience with /a/ was that going by strictly the top most-requested players tended not to be so great because a very high percentage of them got kicked off in the next poll. Because of that I ended up moving towards a system where we (that being Firo and I) would pick new players out of the overall top 15 suggestions that we thought would have the best chance of sticking around. I think doing something like that strikes a good balance, and allows you to avoid a situation like you say where you know /co/ would basically fire a new player at the first available opportunity. --Tottori (talk) 07:26, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

I would like a wikipage that has all of the settings for the cup we are running at the time. It would save everyone time, because managers and testers wouldn't have to ask and people in charge wouldn't have to answer. -- Skywelker (talk) 22:35, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

I like it. Unfortunately at the moment this is still somewhat up in the air. (They're likely going to be Decision-ish, but exactly how Decision-ish is not settled yet.) That doesn't necessarily stop us from making the page now and filling it in later. --Tottori (talk) 07:26, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

I would like to table a motion to have Pybro kicked squarely in the nuts. He continually spams /t/ with his worthless threads. The threads do nothing for our board and generally get deleted within a day by the Mods but not before pushing another thread off the board. Please fine, penalize, flag or otherwise reprimand the fa..Manager if at all possible.

To the guy who wants to whack at my nuts... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xzpndHtdl9A -- Pybro (talk) 21:37, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

Memo to Pybro: you're supposed to engage your board, not harass it. I do not have a problem with adding DED to the sleepy/not-sleepy scale for boards that are not going to be considered for new team expansion if you can't cool your autism. If you're going to introduce the Cup to a new board, you probably ought to know it well enough to avoid situations like this. --Tottori (talk) 07:26, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

Question: tell me what you think about me. I buy my own diamonds and I buy my own rings. Jokes aside is /hm/ considered 'sleepy'? We had a our last team poll before spring and we are releasing a survey to /hm/ around noon today and I plan on closing it on Monday. It currently has 7 votes with one telling /hm/ to kill ourselves. Thanks for reading.--Jynx (talk) 10:09, 19 August 2014 (UTC)